There are multiple reasons to deny Ghislaine Maxwell’s effort at freedom before her July trial, prosecutors said in a Tuesday filing in Manhattan federal court.
Last month, the 59-year-old Maxwell argued through her lawyers that bail should be granted because she is willing to renounce her citizenship in England and France. She also maintained that the evidence against her was exposed as weak by pretrial motions from her defense lawyers.
Additionally, Maxwell offered to place assets belonging to her and her husband under the care of a monitor to ensure the money isn’t squandered even as litigants pursue access to it.
But prosecutors say they cannot count on Maxwell’s offer to renounce her citizenship in England and France because she could change her mind. And, regarding France, prosecutors say renouncing citizenship would still not clear her for extradition if she were there.
They called Maxwell an “extreme flight risk” who could flee by using $500,000 she wants to set aside for living expenses along with the $2 million value of a London townhouse she owns.
“In short, all three of the relevant Bail Reform Act factors – the nature and circumstances of the offense, the strength of the evidence, and the history and characteristics of the defendant – continue to weigh heavily in favor of detention,” prosecutors wrote.
In a December bail request, Maxwell said that she and her husband had about $22.5 million in property and cash. She said over $7.5 million had been set aside for legal expenses.
Maxwell has been held without bail since her July arrest. She has pleaded not guilty. Epstein killed himself in a Manhattan federal jail in August 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges.
Messages seeking comment in response to the government filing were left with Maxwell’s lawyers.